When I think of the serving sizes suggested for a healthy diet, I don’t think I can eat that much at a meal and be comfortable. What happens if children are encouraged to eat more than they are comfortable with – even healthy foods?
While the number of cases of pancreatic cancer has been increasing, new types of targeted medications point toward the possible future of cancer treatment.
Recent research provides the first evidence that aspirin might help to prevent cancer in people with average risk, the American Cancer Society says. The society issued its statement based on an analysis by society scientists. They took a close look at recent studies related to cancer rates among people in research whose main focus was heart disease. People in these earlier studies were randomly assigned to take aspirin or a placebo (fake pill). Recent analyses have combined the numbers from studies of this type. They found that that people who took aspirin had reduced cancer rates. The average reduction was 20% in the 3 to 5 years after they started taking aspirin. Most people took an aspirin daily or every other day. The doses varied. But cancer rates did not fall further for larger doses.
A cheap, common drug may help prevent a risky condition that can occur after a procedure used to diagnose some digestive problems, a study finds. The procedure is called endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ECRP). It uses a long tube attached to a camera. This scope allows a doctor to look at the gall bladder drainage system and pancreas. But some people develop pancreatitis afterward. This is an inflammation of the pancreas. It usually is treated in a hospital and can be deadly. The new study included 602 people who were going to have the scope procedure. All were at above-average risk of developing pancreatitis. They were randomly assigned to receive either indomethacin or a placebo (fake) after the procedure. This was given in the rectum. Indomethacin is a cheap, generic drug. It is used to reduce inflammation, such as in arthritis pain.
Would a cervical polyp that’s an inch by a half inch in size cause you to feel fatigued?
Add another to the list of reasons not to like tax-filing days — a higher risk of fatal traffic accidents. That’s the finding of a new study that looked at 30 years of U.S. traffic data. Researchers analyzed deaths that occurred on tax day (usually April 15) and the days 1 week before and after tax day. In all, there were 6,783 traffic-related deaths on those days. The average was 226 on tax days and 213 on the other days. That’s a difference of about 6%. Researchers say they can’t explain it. Maybe it’s the result of stress, or stress-related drinking. Maybe people are rushing to get to a post office. But since the first years studied, electronic filing has become common. About 3 out of 4 personal tax returns are filed that way now. And electronic filing has not reduced traffic deaths on tax days, researchers said.
Taking fish oil pills won’t protect against heart attacks and strokes for people who already have heart disease, a new review of research finds. Fish oil contains omega-3 fatty acids. Many studies have found a lower risk of death from heart disease and stroke for people who eat fatty fish at least twice a week. The new study looked at people who took fish oil in the form of pills. It combined the results of 14 prior studies. They included more than 20,000 people who had heart and artery disease. People took half a gram to 5 grams of fish oil daily. Researchers kept track of people for 1 to 5 years. In that time, taking fish oil pills made no difference in whether people died from heart disease or any other cause. It also did not affect their chances of heart attack, congestive heart failure, stroke or so-called mini-strokes.
Children with asthma who use non-traditional treatments don’t skip their regular asthma medicines more often than others, a study finds. The study included 187 children with asthma. Their families were part of a larger health survey. The survey gathered information from parents each year for 3 years. They were asked about what medicines their children took. Parents were asked how often the children missed doses. They also were asked about complementary and alternative (CAM) treatments. These included herbs, supplements, chiropractic care and other non-traditional treatments. On average, parents said their children missed about 7% of the medicine doses their doctors prescribed. There was no difference between children who also used CAM treatments and those who did not. The journal Pediatrics published the study online April 9.
Do you really need that test or treatment? In many cases, the answer is no, a coalition of nine doctors’ groups says. The groups released lists of five items each. They said doctors and patients should question whether tests and treatments on the lists are needed. They add to spending on health care. And some may even cause harm, the groups said. The items included most colonoscopies repeated after less than 10 years and antibiotics prescribed for most sinus infections. The doctors said people who faint but don’t have seizures usually don’t need a CT or MRI scan. And most people without heart disease symptoms don’t need routine stress tests. Cancer doctors were one of the groups involved. They listed criteria for stopping treatment of certain end-stage patients. Doctors of internal and family medicine also were part of the coalition.
Changes (mutations) in genes that affect only a child, not the parents, may account for some cases of autism, 3 new studies find. The changes occur in the sperm or egg around the time the child is conceived. Fathers are 4 times as likely to pass on these mutations as mothers, 1 study found. This occurred most often with fathers age 35 or older. Three different teams of researchers did the studies. They took a close look at the DNA in blood samples from families that included a child with autism. Neither the parents nor the other children were affected. The 3 studies included a total of 549 families. In all, hundreds of mutations were found in the autistic children and not in their parents or siblings. Most occurred in only 1 child. But mutations in some genes were found in multiple children and in 2 or more of the studies.